books you don't like

A place to discuss your favorite authors and poets, Christian and secular

Postby Atria35 » Thu May 13, 2010 8:26 am

Etoh*the*Greato (post: 1393992) wrote:Oh yeah. As an adult I totally know that. WHY they kept saying the two were similar right on the cover...? Maybe book reviewers are just bad at this.


Actually, it's because book reviewers rarely actually read the books they get. So many are published, that it takes too much time for the reviewer to read them all. So when they see similarities- if only in that they have small anthropomorphic animals- they make the connections. Sad but true.
User avatar
Atria35
 
Posts: 6295
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:30 am

Postby Makachop^^128 » Thu May 13, 2010 9:12 am

rocklobster (post: 1393977) wrote:I find being forced to read a book tends to make one not be as interested.


Yes, at least for me once I know I have to do something I usually hate it.
Image
"We're not gonna die. We can't die, Bendis. You know why? Because we are so...very...pretty. We are just too pretty for God to let us die."-Mal

http://www.facebook.com/ShaylaChan

http://www.shelfari.com/shaylabot
http://myanimelist.net/profile/ShaylaBot
User avatar
Makachop^^128
 
Posts: 2215
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 3:27 pm
Location: On board Serenity

Postby Mr. SmartyPants » Thu May 13, 2010 9:36 am

Warrior 4 Jesus (post: 1393670) wrote:Any number of crap required reading (high-school)

What books did these include? XD
User avatar
Mr. SmartyPants
 
Posts: 12541
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:00 am

Postby Fish and Chips » Thu May 13, 2010 10:29 am

A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by James Joyce.

I'm still not entirely sure what this book was supposed to be about because I cannot stand James Joyce's writing style.
bkilbour (post: 1393640) wrote:I didn't enjoy reading The Lord of the Flies,
MightiMidget (post: 1393666) wrote:I have to agree with Lord of the Flies.
Makachop^^128 (post: 1393817) wrote:Also Lord of the flies, weird book
What is wrong with all of you.
User avatar
Fish and Chips
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere.

Postby Etoh*the*Greato » Thu May 13, 2010 11:19 am

I liked Lord of the Fries, actually... Good book. I was exposed to some fantastic books because of school that I know for a fact I would never have otherwise read. Some of the most important were books like Catcher in the Rye, and A Separate Peace (Although gads was that book depressing...)
"I do not feel obliged to believe that that same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forego their use." - Galileo Galilei
ImageImageImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
Etoh*the*Greato
 
Posts: 2618
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:46 pm
Location: Missouri

Postby bigsleepj » Thu May 13, 2010 11:46 am

I also liked The Lord of the Flies. It t'was a good book, even if Golding is not the best writer out there.
Unwise Toasting Sermon

The Sweet Smell of CAA
The Avatar Christian Ronin designed for me
An Avatar KhakiBlue gave to me
The avatar Termyt made for me

KhakiBlueSocks wrote:"I'm going to make you a prayer request you can't refuse..." Cue the violins. :lol:

Current Avatar by SirThinks2much - thank you very much! :thumb::)
User avatar
bigsleepj
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: South Africa - Oh yes, better believe it!

Postby ShiroiHikari » Thu May 13, 2010 11:54 am

Catcher in the Rye was definitely an interesting read, though I can't say I count it among my favorites.

Haven't read Lord of the Flies yet.

And yes, being forced to read something really takes away much of the potential enjoyment for me.
fightin' in the eighties
User avatar
ShiroiHikari
 
Posts: 7564
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere between 1983 and 1989

Postby Radical Dreamer » Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 pm

Dude, yeah, Lord of the Flies was one of my favorite books that I read in high school. Does it have something to do with the fact that my class project for the book was drawing a comic adaptation of certain scenes? Maybe. But I do think the book was a very interesting read, and it explored a lot of themes about the root of human nature and the depravity of man. I <3 that book. XD
[color="DeepSkyBlue"]4 8 15 16 23[/color] 42
[color="PaleGreen"]Rushia: YOU ARE MY FAVORITE IGNORANT AMERICAN OF IRISH DECENT. I LOVE YOU AND YOUR POTATOES.[/color]
[color="Orange"]WELCOME TO MOES[/color]

Image

User avatar
Radical Dreamer
 
Posts: 7950
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Some place where I can think up witty things to say under the "Location" category.

Postby Etoh*the*Greato » Thu May 13, 2010 1:26 pm

ShiroiHikari (post: 1394032) wrote:Catcher in the Rye was definitely an interesting read, though I can't say I count it among my favorites.

Haven't read Lord of the Flies yet.

And yes, being forced to read something really takes away much of the potential enjoyment for me.


You're honestly the first female I've ever heard to give that book the time of day. In my class it was universally reviled by that subset of the population. I've found it to bethe case elsewhere as well. Congrats! :grin:
"I do not feel obliged to believe that that same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forego their use." - Galileo Galilei
ImageImageImageImage
Image
Image
User avatar
Etoh*the*Greato
 
Posts: 2618
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:46 pm
Location: Missouri

Postby rocklobster » Fri May 14, 2010 4:13 am

some other books I didn't like:
The Final Warning by James Patterson--The fourth book in James Patterson's Maximum Ride series, and the one that killed the series for me. Up until then, I'd found it interesting and fast-paced. Then Patterson had to stop the story every five pages with environmentalist preaching. I was wondering when Captain Planet was gonna show up and say "The power is yours!"
My Teacher Blew Up the Planet by Bruce Coville--The final book in the My Teacher is an Alien series. Up until this book, the story was excellent. Then Coville told us this ridiculous piece of info: that humans were once telepathic and quite intelligent and peaceful. OK, what changed us? Why, television! Before TV, we never started any wars. Uh, Coville, what about the Civil War? WWI? The Crusades? Those were all fought before TV even existed!
"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you. I appointed you to be a prophet of all nations."
--Jeremiah 1:5
Image
Hit me up on social media!
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007205508246<--Facebook

I'm also on Amino as Radical Edward, and on Reddit as Rocklobster as well.


click here for my playlist!
my last fm profile!
User avatar
rocklobster
 
Posts: 8903
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 1:27 pm
Location: Planet Claire

Postby mkalv » Sun May 16, 2010 12:14 pm

I didn't like this book called The Gypsy Game. I just found it a boring and misleading read.
User avatar
mkalv
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:24 pm

Postby Blacklight » Sat May 29, 2010 9:08 pm

I normally will not stop reading a book until I've finished it... as a rule.
But I got halfway through Showdown by Ted Dekker and gave up on it; I got bored, angry at several things, mostly bored, I ended up skimming through the remaining half and didn't find it to be anything more interesting.
I didn't care for Saint (same author) either; it's the sequal to Showdown, but I didn't know that until I had finished Saint.
Skin was Okay, House was... a bit less Okay, but the movie was downright awful.
Overall, I don't like Dekker.

I wish I could remember Twilight, but it was quite a while back; I didn't and don't like it, but I don't exactly 'hate it with a passion'.

I don't really remember all the books I've read and disliked; I guess I have to block ot out of my memory afterwards.
[color="Blue"]@)[/color][color="Green"]}~`,~[/color]
[font="Book Antiqua"][color="DeepSkyBlue"]Carry This Rose In Your Sig, As Thanks, To All The CAA Moderators.[/color][/font]

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

[color="Pink"]chatbot 03:36 - Blacklight asks, are you sane?
My answer: It's hard to say, really.[/color]
User avatar
Blacklight
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: Nowhere...

Postby Warrior 4 Jesus » Sat May 29, 2010 9:40 pm

What have you got against Ted Dekker? I understand that you may not enjoy the books but how can they cause you to be angry?
User avatar
Warrior 4 Jesus
 
Posts: 4844
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 10:52 pm
Location: The driest continent that isn't Antarctica.

Postby Blacklight » Sat May 29, 2010 11:22 pm

What I meant was that some (small) things in that book frustrated me, I can get pretty upset at various 'small details'; not that I can always put my finger on them.
I don't have anything 'against' Ted Dekker, but I don't 'like' him; he's not my favorite author and I didn't love the books I read by him.

I am constantly annoyed at the black=evil white=good thing.
What I remember bugging me in Showdown was how when the people went 'bad' they were listening to 'evil gothic headbanging music' and the graffiti they did was in a 'gothic font' (as if it would matter that they used some kind of font) and how not only was the bad guy wearing black, but he had black hair.
(Surprise?)
I even got mad when I was reading Ouran and out came "but white is the color of good!"
I get frustrated at stupid things, but it just ends up digging up a whole side of me that wants to rant.
I have my own way of 'seeing things', and I guess I get offended for no real reason.
I may sound like I'm ranting, (in this or my previous post) but I'm really not; I don't see good or evil as 'colors', and it annoys me to see it used all the time, with more people fueling it, it just frustrates me.
(And I also hate stereotypes unless they're used to parody something.)

Again, I'm not ranting, I just get upset at stupid things.
Doesn't make me hate the author; I did get a little bored in the middle of Skin though, it started out pretty exciting, then it seemed to slow down, but it ended pretty well.
[color="Blue"]@)[/color][color="Green"]}~`,~[/color]
[font="Book Antiqua"][color="DeepSkyBlue"]Carry This Rose In Your Sig, As Thanks, To All The CAA Moderators.[/color][/font]

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

[color="Pink"]chatbot 03:36 - Blacklight asks, are you sane?
My answer: It's hard to say, really.[/color]
User avatar
Blacklight
 
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:45 pm
Location: Nowhere...

Postby Firebird3613 » Mon May 31, 2010 9:26 pm

Robinson Crusoe: I had to read it for school, and thought it was really boring and dragged on way to long. Every 50 pages there would be a remotely interesting part, and then last for aonly a couple pages. Then it would be more boring parts for another 50-60 pages.

Swiss Family Robinson: Boring and unrealistic. The writing style was really dry.

Treasure Island: I didn't hate this book, but I didn't particulary like it either. I thought it dragged on, and there were only a couple of interesting parts. But those were written it a dry writing style, and it really wasn't enjoyable.

Ted Dekker: I just couldn't get into his books. I tried Thr3e and skipped to the end because I got bored. I think it was his writing style.

Charles Dickens: I tried A Tale of Two Cities and failed to get past the second chapter. I flipped through a couple of others and found nothing interesting.

That's all I can think of for right now. I'm sure I'll think of something else.
:hits_self <----This smilie made me laugh. I'm not really sure why...:lol:
User avatar
Firebird3613
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 4:17 pm
Location: I could be just a dream, in which case I don't live anywhere. ;)

Postby OfficerSting » Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:02 am

I once had to read Ray Bradbury's Dandelion Wine for English class. To say it was dreadfully dull would be like saying that the sun is a bit warm. Funny thing is, he also wrote Fahrenheit 451, one of my all time favorites.
"For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord." [SIZE="2"]Romans 8:38-39 (NIV)[/SIZE]
User avatar
OfficerSting
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:07 pm

Postby Warrior 4 Jesus » Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:20 pm

Blacklight, sounds like you need some space to vent. Black has always been symbolic of good and white, symbolic of evil. Ted's not saying black clothing etc. is evil but black is created as an absence of light. If you looked into Ted's life you'd find that he often wears black clothing and listens to heavy music of most genres. He has nothing against head-banging music etc. Dekker has the interesting position of being a transition between Christian fiction and non-Christian fiction.
User avatar
Warrior 4 Jesus
 
Posts: 4844
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 10:52 pm
Location: The driest continent that isn't Antarctica.

Postby Atria35 » Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:56 pm

Warrior 4 Jesus (post: 1398735) wrote:. Dekker has the interesting position of being a transition between Christian fiction and non-Christian fiction.


.... In what alternate universe? :lol:
That man writes such obviously Christian literature that you might as well just put the cover over a Bible.

..... Okay, so it's not as bad as that, but the difference between his writing and those that are going for something more "Christian" is the difference between chocolate ice cream and a fudgesicle. I haven't found a significant difference yet.
User avatar
Atria35
 
Posts: 6295
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:30 am

Postby Htom Sirveaux » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:18 pm

Atria35 wrote:.... In what alternate universe? :lol:
That man writes such obviously Christian literature that you might as well just put the cover over a Bible.

..... Okay, so it's not as bad as that, but the difference between his writing and those that are going for something more "Christian" is the difference between chocolate ice cream and a fudgesicle. I haven't found a significant difference yet.


This is why I was almost sad when Anne Rice got saved. It's like, "Well, there goes her creativity as a writer." Christian literature needs someone truly edgy. Someone who recognizes that Christian fiction doesn't have to preach. What we need is Clive Barker with a conscience.
Image
If this post seems too utterly absurd or ridiculous to be taken seriously, don't. :)
User avatar
Htom Sirveaux
 
Posts: 2429
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Camp Hill, PA

Postby Atria35 » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:32 pm

Htom Sirveaux (post: 1398747) wrote:This is why I was almost sad when Anne Rice got saved. It's like, "Well, there goes her creativity as a writer." Christian literature needs someone truly edgy. Someone who recognizes that Christian fiction doesn't have to preach. What we need is Clive Barker with a conscience.


So many try, so many fail. It makes me wonder whether it's something wrong with how it's approached? It seems like a lot of writers concentrate so much on the message that the story gets lost in it. I wonder why they don't take their cues from LoTR, or Narnia, where the message(s) was secondary to the story.

Back on topic- books I hate? Well, I have an intense dislike for Dickens. It's rather..... dry, even for that time period. And since he got paid based on how much he wrote, there's just so much extra to the story.
User avatar
Atria35
 
Posts: 6295
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:30 am

Postby Yamamaya » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:36 pm

Fish and Chips (post: 1394020) wrote:A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by James Joyce.

I'm still not entirely sure what this book was supposed to be about because I cannot stand James Joyce's writing style.What is wrong with all of you.


No true Irishman hates James Joyce.(I found his short story "Araby."

Also I agree about Lord of the Flies. That book was epic.

One of Ours by Willa Cather. Most boring author I've ever read. She makes me want to claw my eyes out. Some character studies are interesting but hers are not.

All this hatred for Dickens is making me very very angry.
Image
Image
User avatar
Yamamaya
 
Posts: 1609
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: Azumanga Daioh High school

Postby Cadence » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:48 pm

Yamamaya (post: 1398756) wrote:
All this hatred for Dickens is making me very very angry.
Image


Thank you. I was just composing my thoughts to write a lengthy post full of my objections to the Dickens hate, but I think your picture tells it well enough. =)
User avatar
Cadence
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 3:24 pm

Postby Radical Dreamer » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:57 pm

Firebird3613 (post: 1398002) wrote:Charles Dickens: I tried A Tale of Two Cities and failed to get past the second chapter. I flipped through a couple of others and found nothing interesting.


That's really a shame, because A Tale of Two Cities is really an excellent story! I'd suggest watching the 1935 version of the movie instead; that's what I did. XD It's a long movie, but it's a great adaptation of the story. I can't stand Dickens's writing style either, and his books will put me to sleep in very little time. XD Definitely try that out, though! XD
[color="DeepSkyBlue"]4 8 15 16 23[/color] 42
[color="PaleGreen"]Rushia: YOU ARE MY FAVORITE IGNORANT AMERICAN OF IRISH DECENT. I LOVE YOU AND YOUR POTATOES.[/color]
[color="Orange"]WELCOME TO MOES[/color]

Image

User avatar
Radical Dreamer
 
Posts: 7950
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Some place where I can think up witty things to say under the "Location" category.

Postby Yamamaya » Fri Jun 04, 2010 9:13 pm

Cadence (post: 1398763) wrote:Thank you. I was just composing my thoughts to write a lengthy post full of my objections to the Dickens hate, but I think your picture tells it well enough. =)


:thumb:

However I am going to write a few objections to Dickens hatred in this post. :P

Dickens is a master of creating excellently outrageous characters. He creates probably the most hilarious bad guys in British Literature.

His stories are very enthralling. He draws you in with his characters and storyline which goes through many twists and turns throughout his books.

Some might consider him dry but you have to keep in mind his books were written nearly 200 years ago. The style was much different back then. Excessive description was considered the norm.
Image
User avatar
Yamamaya
 
Posts: 1609
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: Azumanga Daioh High school

Postby Atria35 » Fri Jun 04, 2010 9:22 pm

Yamamaya (post: 1398773) wrote:Some might consider him dry but you have to keep in mind his books were written nearly 200 years ago. The style was much different back then. Excessive description was considered the norm.


I know. I've read other authors from that era. I still don't care for Dickens or his prose. I don't particularly care for his characters. And while I do admit that the twists his stories have can be interesting, everything else outweighs that for me.
User avatar
Atria35
 
Posts: 6295
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:30 am

Postby Fish and Chips » Fri Jun 04, 2010 9:34 pm

Yamamaya (post: 1398756) wrote:No true Irishman hates James Joyce.
I'm Scottish.
User avatar
Fish and Chips
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: Nowhere.

Postby ich1990 » Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:07 pm

Atria35 (post: 1398742) wrote:.... In what alternate universe? :lol:
That man writes such obviously Christian literature that you might as well just put the cover over a Bible.

..... Okay, so it's not as bad as that, but the difference between his writing and those that are going for something more "Christian" is the difference between chocolate ice cream and a fudgesicle. I haven't found a significant difference yet.


Have you read Boneman's Daughters? There wasn't anything significantly different from that book and the average Koontz novel (except for writing quality, unfortunately).
Where an Eidolon, named night, on a black throne reigns upright.
User avatar
ich1990
 
Posts: 1546
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 2:01 pm
Location: The Land of Sona-Nyl

Postby Nate » Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:16 pm

Radical Dreamer wrote:That's really a shame, because A Tale of Two Cities is really an excellent story!

Corrie you misspelled "crappy" in that sentence. As a Grammar Ranger I expected better of you.
Yama wrote:His stories are very enthralling.

I didn't know "enthralling" was a synonym for "horribly eye-clawingly boring to the point of being a cure for insomnia." I guess you learn something new every day!
Image

Ezekiel 23:20
User avatar
Nate
 
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Oh right, like anyone actually cares.

Postby Radical Dreamer » Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:25 pm

Nate (post: 1398790) wrote:Corrie you misspelled "crappy" in that sentence. As a Grammar Ranger I expected better of you.


Psh, whatever! XD It's a great story about self-sacrifice in the end. XD It's a long movie, but I thought it was a rewarding watch. XD

Also, you misspelled "the" as "a."
[color="DeepSkyBlue"]4 8 15 16 23[/color] 42
[color="PaleGreen"]Rushia: YOU ARE MY FAVORITE IGNORANT AMERICAN OF IRISH DECENT. I LOVE YOU AND YOUR POTATOES.[/color]
[color="Orange"]WELCOME TO MOES[/color]

Image

User avatar
Radical Dreamer
 
Posts: 7950
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Some place where I can think up witty things to say under the "Location" category.

Postby Atria35 » Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:01 am

ich1990 (post: 1398789) wrote:Have you read Boneman's Daughters? There wasn't anything significantly different from that book and the average Koontz novel (except for writing quality, unfortunately).


Nope- that's a newer one. I borrowed him off of my friend in Senior year of high school and the first two years of college. So I read Black, Red, White, Three, Blink of an Eye, Showdown, Skin, Obessed..... and of those, only Three seemed closest to a non-Christian book. But unfortunately, I also found myself incredibly bored with these books, and had Three figured out in the first six chapters. So I'm also not impressed with his writing style, though that's a personal opinion.
User avatar
Atria35
 
Posts: 6295
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:30 am

Previous Next

Return to Book Corner

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests